Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBerberoglu, Giray
dc.contributor.authorKalender, Ilker
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-13T10:30:51Z
dc.date.available2019-06-13T10:30:51Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn1303-0485
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.estp.com.tr/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/2017.2.0280.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/3492
dc.description.abstractAdmission into university in Turkey is very competitive and features a number of practical problems regarding not only the test administration process itself, but also concerning the psychometric properties of test scores. Computerized adaptive testing (CAT) is seen as a possible alternative approach to solve these problems. In the first phase of the study, a series of CAT simulations based on real students' responses to science items were conducted in order to determine which test termination rule produced more comparable results with scores made on the paper and pencil version of the test. An average of 17 items was used to terminate the CAT administration for a reasonable reliability level as opposed to the normal 45 items. Moreover, CAT based science scores not only produced similar correlations when using mathematics subtest scores as an external criterion, but also ranked the students similarly to the paper and pencil test version. In the second phase, a live CAT administration was implemented using an item bank composed of 242 items with a group of students who had previously taken the exam the paper and pencil version of the test. A correlation of.76 was found between the CAT and paper and pencil scores for this group. The results seem to support the CAT version of the subtests as a feasible alternative approach in Turkey's university admission system.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.12738/estp.2017.2.0280en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectComputerized adaptive testingen_US
dc.subjectItem response theoryen_US
dc.subjectUniversity admission examinationsen_US
dc.subjectValidityen_US
dc.subjectClassificationen_US
dc.titleCan Computerized Adaptive Testing Work in Students' Admission to Higher Education Programs in Turkey?en_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalEDUCATIONAL SCIENCES-THEORY & PRACTICEen_US
dc.identifier.volume17en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage573en_US
dc.identifier.endpage596en_US
dc.identifier.wos1303-0485


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record