• Türkçe
    • English
  • English 
    • Türkçe
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   DSpace Home
  • Fakülteler / Faculties
  • Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi / Faculty of Health Sciences
  • View Item
  •   DSpace Home
  • Fakülteler / Faculties
  • Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi / Faculty of Health Sciences
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the spine functional index

Thumbnail
View/Open
document(1).pdf (1.385Mb)
Date
2015
Author
Tonga, Eda
Gabel, Charles Philip
Karayazgan, Sedef
Cuesta-Vargas, Antonio I.
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Background: The Spine Functional Index (SFI) is a patient reported outcome measure with sound clinimetric properties and clinical viability for the determination of whole-spine impairment. To date, no validated Turkish version is available. The purpose of this study is to cross-culturally adapted the SFI for Turkish-speaking patients (SFI-Tk) and determine the psychometric properties of reliability, validity and factor structure in a Turkish population with spine musculoskeletal disorders. Methods: The SFI English version was culturally adapted and translated into Turkish using a double forward and backward method according to established guidelines. Patients (n = 285, cervical = l29, lumbar = 151, cervical and lumbar region = 5, 73% female, age 45 +/- 1) with spine musculoskeletal disorders completed the SFI-Tk at baseline and after a seven day period for test-retest reliability. For criterion validity the Turkish version of the Functional Rating Index (FRI) was used plus the Neck Disability Index (NDI) for cervical patients and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for back patients. Additional psychometric properties were determined for internal consistency (Chronbach's a), criterion validity and factor structure. Results: There was a high degree of internal consistency (a = 0.85, item range 0.80-0.88) and test-retest reliability (r = 0.93, item range = 0.75-0.95). The factor analysis demonstrated a one-factor solution explaining 24.2% of total variance. Criterion validity with the ODI was high (r = 0.71, p < 0.001) while the FRI and NDI were fair (r = 0.52 and r = 0.58, respectively). The SFI-Tk showed no missing responses with the 'half-mark' option used in 11.75% of total responses by 77.9% of participants. Measurement error from SEM and MDC90 were respectively 2.96% and 7.12%. Conclusions: The SFI-Tk demonstrated a one-factor solution and is a reliable and valid instrument. The SFI-Tk consists of simple and easily understood wording and may be used to assess spine region musculoskeletal disorders in Turkish speaking patients.
URI
https://hqlo.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/s12955-015-0219-3
http://hdl.handle.net/11727/4341
Collections
  • Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi / Faculty of Health Sciences [69]

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
Atmire NV
 

 

  • Politika

Politika
Kullanıcı Rehberi
Başkent Üniversitesi Kütüphanesi
Başkent Üniversitesi

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsxmlui.ArtifactBrowser.Navigation.browse_typexmlui.ArtifactBrowser.Navigation.browse_languagexmlui.ArtifactBrowser.Navigation.browse_publicationcategoryThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsxmlui.ArtifactBrowser.Navigation.browse_typexmlui.ArtifactBrowser.Navigation.browse_languagexmlui.ArtifactBrowser.Navigation.browse_publicationcategory

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
Atmire NV