Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorKoç, C.
dc.contributor.authorKamburoglu, K.
dc.contributor.authorSönmez, G.
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, F.
dc.contributor.authorGulen, O.
dc.contributor.authorKarahan, S.
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-30T08:02:49Z
dc.date.available2020-12-30T08:02:49Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn0143-2885en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/5299
dc.description.abstractAim To assess observer performance in detecting endodontic complications using three different cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) units with and without the application of artefact reduction modes. Methodology The study involved 40 freshly extracted human mandibular teeth (n = 10 per group) and divided randomly into four endodontic complication groups. Group 1) Instrument fracture; Group 2) Strip perforation; Group 3) Canal underfilling; and Group 4) Canal overfilling. Images of each tooth were obtained using three different CBCT units offering artefact reduction algorithms: the ProMax 3D Max, the Pax Flex 3D and the Dentri S. Four observers evaluated the images for the presence/absence of the four simulated endodontic complications. Weighted kappa coefficients and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to reveal the intra- and inter-observer agreement for each imaging mode, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate the observers' performance. DeLong tests were used to compare the results for each image mode and observer using a significance level of alpha = 0.05. Results In each of the four simulated endodontic complication groups, no significant differences were observed with and without application of artefact reduction for any of the three CBCT units tested. Only two significant differences were detected, and both were between the ProMax 3D Max at low mode AR and ProMax 3D Max without AR: observer 2 in group 1 (P = 0.0001) and observer 4 in group 4 (P = 0.0256). Conclusion For each of the three CBCT units tested, application of artefact reduction for detecting endodontic complications is not recommended as a routine tool.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1111/iej.13051en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectartefact reduction algorithmsen_US
dc.subjectcone beam computed tomographyen_US
dc.subjectendodontic complicationsen_US
dc.titleAbility to detect endodontic complications using three different cone beam computed tomography units with and without artefact reduction modes: an ex vivo studyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalINTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNALen_US
dc.identifier.volume52en_US
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.startpage725en_US
dc.identifier.endpage736en_US
dc.identifier.wos000466408100016en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85058676740en_US
dc.contributor.pubmedID30506961en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergien_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster