Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorGezmis, Esin
dc.contributor.authorPeebles, Charles
dc.contributor.authorFlett, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorAbbas, Ausami
dc.contributor.authorHarden, Stephen
dc.contributor.authorShambrook, James
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-25T08:02:39Z
dc.date.available2021-05-25T08:02:39Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn2146-3123en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://balkanmedicaljournal.org/en/comparison-of-molli-and-shmolli-in-terms-of-t1-reactivity-and-the-relationship-between-t1-reactivity-and-conventional-signs-of-response-during-adenosine-stress-perfusion-cmr-133697
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/5908
dc.description.abstractBackground: One of the most important techniques of cardiac magnetic resonance in assessment of coronary heart diseases is adenosine stress myocardial first-pass perfusion imaging. Using this imaging method, there should be an adequate response to the drug adenosine to make an accurate evaluation. The conventional signs of drug response are not always observed and are often subjective. Methods based on splenic perfusion might possess limitations as well. Therethre, T1 mapping presents as a novel, quantitative and reliable method. There are several studies analyzing this newly discovered property of different T1 mapping sequences. However most of these studies are enrolling only one of the techniques. Aims: To compare modified look-locker inversion recovery and shortened modified look-locker inversion recovery sequences in terms of T1 reactivity and to determine the relationship between T1 reactivity and conventional stress adequacy assessment methods in adenosine stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance. Study Design: A cross-sectional study using STARD reporting guideline. Methods: Thirty-tbur consecutive patients, who were referred for adenosine stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance with suspect of myocardial ischemia, were prospectively enrolled into the study. Four patients were disqualified, and thirty patients were included in the final analysis. Using both modified look-locker inversion recovery and shortened modified look-locker inversion recovery, midventricular short axis slices of T1 maps were acquired at rest and dining peak adenosine stress before gadolinium administration. Then, they were divided into six segments according to the 17-segment model proposed by the American Heart Association, and separate measurements were made from each segment. Mean rest and mean stress T1 values of remote, ischemic, and infarcted myocardium were calculated individually per subject. During adenosine administration. patients' heart rates and blood pressures are measured and recorded every one minute. Adenosine stress perfusion images were examined for the presence of splenic switch-off. Results: There was a significant difference between rest and stress T1 values of remote myocardium in both modified look-locker inversion recovery and shortened modified look-locker inversion recovery (p<0.001). In both modified look-locker inversion recovery and shortened modified look-locker inversion recovery there was no significant correlation between T1 reactivity and heart rates response (modified look-locker inversion recovery p=0.30, shortened modified look-locker inversion recovery p=0.10), blood pressures response (modified look-locker inversion recovery p=0.062, shortened modified look-locker inversion recovery p=0.078), splenic perfusion (modified look-locker inversion recovery p=0.35, shortened modified look-locker inversion recovery p=0.053). There was no statistically significant difference between modified look-locker inversion recovery and shortened modified look-locker inversion recovery regarding Ti reactivity of remote (p=0.330), ischemic (p=0.068), and infarcted (p=0.116) myocardium. Conclusion: T1 reactivity is independent of the other stress response signs and modified look-locker inversion recovery and shortened modified look-locker inversion recovery do not differ in terms of T1 reactivity.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.4274/balkanmedj.galenos.2020.2019.12.161en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAdenosine stress adequacyen_US
dc.subjectcardiac magnetic resonanceen_US
dc.subjectcoronary heart diseaseen_US
dc.subjectMOLLIen_US
dc.subjectShMOLLIen_US
dc.subjectT1 mappingen_US
dc.titleComparison of MOLLI and ShMOLLI in Terms of T1 Reactivity and the Relationship between T1 Reactivity and Conventional Signs of Response during Adenosine Stress Perfusion CMRen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalBALKAN MEDICAL JOURNALen_US
dc.identifier.volume37en_US
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.startpage260en_US
dc.identifier.endpage268en_US
dc.identifier.wos000559013100005en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85089358779en_US
dc.contributor.pubmedID32319279en_US
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0002-1001-6028en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergien_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAE-8301-2021en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster