Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorSukun, Abdullah
dc.contributor.authorTekeli, Feyza
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-04T11:16:57Z
dc.date.available2023-01-04T11:16:57Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn0971-4502en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/8547
dc.description.abstractDevices such as stents and flow diverters require the use of safe and fast antiplatelet therapy. We aimed to compare the responses to clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor by assessing the Platelet Function Analysis (PFA-100)-Innovance test results of patients undergoing endovascular stenting to determine their resistance rates. Sixty-one women and 55 men, aged 18-87 years, were included in this study. Patients were divided into three groups: clopidogrel treatment, prasugrel treatment, and ticagrelor treatment. The systemic diseases of the patients, especially hypertension and diabetes, were recorded. The test results were evaluated according to the results for the collagen/epinephrine (COL-EPI), collagen/adenosine (COL-ADP), and P2Y results. The PFA-100-Innovance results for COL-EPI and P2Y were significantly higher for patients treated with prasugrel and ticagrelor compared with patients treated with clopidogrel (COL-EPI, p = 0.001; P2Y, p = 0.001). Clopidogrel resistance was identified in 31 patients (26.7%), and prasugrel resistance was identified in 4 patients (3.4%). Ticagrelor resistance was not detected. Therefore, 30.1% of patients were classified as drug-resistant. Perioperative bleeding was not detected in any patient. Hypertension was the most common disease recorded for patients being treated for cerebral aneurysm, and diabetes was the most common disease recorded for patients who underwent peripheral artery stenting (p = 0.002). Potent antiplatelet agents, such as prasugrel and ticagrelor, have a low rate of resistance but are associated with an increased bleeding risk. Thus, the choice of a suitable drug during the treatment window remains a critical factor when determining treatment strategies.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1007/s12288-022-01600-7en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectPFA-100en_US
dc.subjectClopidogrelen_US
dc.subjectTicagreloren_US
dc.subjectPrasugrelen_US
dc.titleComparison of Clopidogrel, Prasugrel and Ticagrelor Response of Patients by PFA-100-Innovance Test Resultsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalINDIAN JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY AND BLOOD TRANSFUSIONen_US
dc.identifier.volume39
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.startpage294
dc.identifier.endpage299
dc.identifier.wos000879132300001en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85141351208en_US
dc.contributor.pubmedID37006988
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0003-0047-0857en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergien_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster