Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorGojayev, Afig
dc.contributor.authorYuksel, Cemil
dc.contributor.authorAkbulut, Serkan
dc.contributor.authorErsen, Ogun
dc.contributor.authorBakirarar, Batuhan
dc.contributor.authorGulpinar, Basak
dc.contributor.authorCoruh, Aysegul Gursoy
dc.contributor.authorUnal, Ali Ekrem
dc.contributor.authorDemirci, Salim
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-06T12:53:47Z
dc.date.available2023-01-06T12:53:47Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.urihttps://assets.cureus.com/uploads/original_article/pdf/122064/20221221-17980-1ncnwts.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/8562
dc.description.abstractBackground Previous studies have shown that pelvimetry can be valuable in predicting surgical difficulties in rectal cancer operations. However, its usability in predicting circumferential resection margin (CRM) involvement remains debatable. This study investigated the factors affecting CRM status and the importance of computed tomography (CT) pelvimetry in predicting CRM involvement in laparoscopic resection of middle and lower rectal cancer.Methodology In this study, we retrospectively investigated the data of 111 patients who underwent a laparoscopic operation for middle and lower rectum cancer at Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical Oncology between January 2014 and January 2020. The predictive value of CT pelvimetry and other variables on the CRM status was analyzed.Results The following four pelvic parameters differed significantly between the genders: transverse diameter of the pelvic inlet (p = 0.024), anteroposterior diameter of the pelvic outlet (p = 0.003), transverse diameter of the pelvic outlet (p < 0.001), and pelvic depth (p < 0.001). The effect of pelvic anatomic parameters on CRM involvement was not found to be significant. It was found that tumor height from the anal verge (p = 0.004), tumor size (p < 0.001), and gender (p = 0.033) were significant risk factors for CRM involvement. Survival was poor in patients with male gender (p = 0.032), perineural invasion (p < 0.001), and grade 3 tumor.Conclusions In this study, no benefit was found in predicting CRM positivity from CT pelvimetry in the laparoscopic resection of middle and lower rectal cancer. Besides, tumor height from the anal verge, tumor size, and gender were important factors for CRM positivity. Although our study sheds light on this issue, prospective randomized studies with larger sample sizes are needed.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.7759/cureus.31745en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjecttomographyen_US
dc.subjectrectal canceren_US
dc.subjectpositive surgical marginen_US
dc.subjectpelvimetryen_US
dc.subjectlaparoscopyen_US
dc.titleCan CT Pelvimetry Be Used to Predict Circumferential Resection Margin Positivity in Laparoscopic Resection of Middle and Lower Rectum Cancer?en_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalCUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCEen_US
dc.identifier.volume14en_US
dc.identifier.issue11en_US
dc.identifier.wos000895308700036en_US
dc.contributor.pubmedID36569682en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergien_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster