Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAydin, Ulkem
dc.contributor.authorYildirim, Derya
dc.contributor.authorGormez, Ozlem
dc.contributor.authorBozdemir, Esin
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Omer
dc.contributor.authorErik, Ayse Aydogmus
dc.contributor.authorOrhan, Mukkadder
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-11T12:13:56Z
dc.date.available2019-06-11T12:13:56Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn1735-1065
dc.identifier.urihttps://neoscriber.org/cdn/serve/313eb/31ebd7a844581cb14eedd08d8dca2fb81f709d9a/iranjradiol-14-02-40701.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/3447
dc.description.abstractBackground: Stafne bone cavities (SBCs) are typically seen on panoramic radiographs as unilocular, rounded or ovoid shaped, welldefined corticated radiolucencies that are located between the mandibular first molar and the angle of the mandible below the inferior alveolar canal, but they may rarely have different radiographic appearances and locations. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the imaging features of SBC presenting various typical and atypical features and to show the contribution of different imaging techniques to diagnosis. Patients and Methods: Seventeen patients who had a panoramic radiograph that revealed an image compatible with SBC were investigated in this study. In addition to panoramic radiography, lateral oblique mandible projection for three patients, cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for nine patients, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for two patients were performed to determine the exact location of the cavity and to confirm the diagnosis. Results: Seventeen patients were diagnosed with SBC. Two patients had bilobed SBC, one patient had a SBC on the buccal surface of the posterior mandible, one patient had a SBC located in the ramus mandible, one patient had a SBC located in the canine-premolar region namely anterior lingual variant as rare conditions. Conclusion: Imaging techniques such as CBCT and MRI have provided detailed information about definitive diagnosis of SBC in addition to panoramic radiographs. These techniques show the size, location and content of the SBC. If the SBC is atypical, complementary imaging techniques gain more importance.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.5812/iranjradiol.40701en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectStafne Bone Cavityen_US
dc.subjectPanoramic Radiographyen_US
dc.subjectCone-Beam Computed Tomographyen_US
dc.subjectMagnetic Resonance Imagingen_US
dc.titleImaging Characteristics of Stafne Bone Cavity: Pictorial Essayen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalIRANIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGYen_US
dc.identifier.volume14en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.wos000407854400014


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record