Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOzsoy, Omur Polat
dc.contributor.authorGonuldas, Sefika Ruzin
dc.contributor.authorPamukcu, Hande
dc.contributor.authorKural, Feride
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-11T13:28:11Z
dc.date.available2019-06-11T13:28:11Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn2149-9063
dc.identifier.urihttp://cms.galenos.com.tr/Uploads/Article_16029/33-46.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/3464
dc.description.abstractObjective: The purpose of this study was to compare the skeletal, dentoalveolar and periodontal effects that occurred after rapid maxillary expansion (RME) and semirapid maxillary expansion (SRME) with an acrylic splint bonded expansion appliance and also to compare the degree of root resorption in the supporting teeth during expansion. Materials and Methods: The sample of the study included 19 patients having maxillary constriction requiring bilateral upper premolar extraction. The semi-rapid group consisted of 10 patients and the rapid group consisted of 9 patients. Lateral and posteroanterior (PA) cephalometric radiographs were taken at the beginning of the treatment, at the end of expansion and after 3 months of retention period. Eleven patients underwent low-dose computed tomography (CT) at the beginning of treatment and at the end of retention period, after giving informed consent. The evaluation of root resorption was made using a scanning electron microscope from the extracted teeth. Results: Both lateral and PA radiographs showed similar changes between the groups. Posterior nasal cavity width, palatal maxillary width, the distance between palatinal roots and the distance between incisor roots showed significant increase in the CT measurements. Buccal bone thickness decreased and palatal bone thickness increased in all molar and premolar teeth examined. Root resorption was seen in both groups, but no significant differences were observed between the groups. Conclusion: Some differences were seen in short-time effects between SRME and RME but these differences were temporary and disappeared at the end of the retention period. The qualitative evaluation of the roots showed that the location and degree of the root resorption were similar between the groups.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.4274/meandros.03522en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectRapid maxillary expansionen_US
dc.subjectSemi-rapid maxillary expansionen_US
dc.subjectComputed tomographyen_US
dc.subjectRoot resorptionen_US
dc.titleComparison of Dentofacial and Periodontal Effects of Rapid and Semi-rapid Maxillary Expansionen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalMEANDROS MEDICAL AND DENTAL JOURNALen_US
dc.identifier.volume18en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage33en_US
dc.identifier.endpage46en_US
dc.identifier.wos000406502700006


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record