Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGokcen, Esra Yesiloz
dc.contributor.authorOz, Firdevs Tulga
dc.contributor.authorOzcelik, Berrin
dc.contributor.authorOrhan, Ayse Isil
dc.contributor.authorOzgul, Betul Memis
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-20T11:59:45Z
dc.date.available2019-06-20T11:59:45Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn1310-2818
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/13102818.2016.1223556?needAccess=true
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/3644
dc.description.abstractIn recent years, different biotechnological materials and modalities with antibacterial activity are being developed for oral cavity disinfection. However, the antimicrobial effects of all these materials have not been studied and understood in detail. Thus, the aim of this study was to compare the antibacterial activity of ozone therapy with dentine-bonding agents (containing antibacterial monomer 12-meth-acryloyloxydodecylpyridinium bromide (MDPB) and 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) and Ca(OH)(2) for deciduous teeth in vitro. The antibacterial effectiveness of the studied materials was determined by using a tooth cavity model on cylindrical cavities created in 90 deciduous second mandibular molars. Streptococcus mutans suspension was inoculated in the cavities. The teeth were distributed into six study groups (five different modalities and a negative control group). Dentine samples, which were collected from the cavities before and after the treatment sessions, were microbiologically evaluated and the materials' antibacterial activities were compared. There were statistically significiant differences in the S. mutans counts before and after treatment (P < 0.05). In terms of antibacterial efficiency, 60-second O-3 treatment was found to be the most successful method, followed by 30-second O-3, Clearfil Protect Bond (containing MDPB), Clearfil SE Bond (containing MDP) and Ca(OH)(2) treatment. The results from this study suggested that longer exposure to ozone might have more beneficial effects in terms of antibacterial activity for reducing the levels of S.mutans.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1080/13102818.2016.1223556en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectBiotechnological materialsen_US
dc.subjectOzone therapyen_US
dc.subjectDeciduous teethen_US
dc.subjectDisinfectionen_US
dc.subjectAntibacterial activityen_US
dc.subjectMicrobiologyen_US
dc.titleAssessment of antibacterial activity of different treatment modalities in deciduous teeth: an in vitro studyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalBIOTECHNOLOGY & BIOTECHNOLOGICAL EQUIPMENTen_US
dc.identifier.volume30en_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1192en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1198en_US
dc.identifier.wos000387443800021


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record