Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCelik, Cigdem
dc.contributor.authorArhun, Neslihan
dc.contributor.authorYamanel, Kivanc
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-18T14:03:47Z
dc.date.available2019-12-18T14:03:47Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.issn1011-7571
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.karger.com/Article/Pdf/364874
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/4476
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance of a nanohybrid and a microhybrid composite in class I and II restorations after 3 years. Subjects and Methods: A total of 82 class I and class II restorations were performed in 31 patients (10 males and 21 females) using Grandio and QuiXfil with self-etch adhesives (Futurabond and Xeno III). The restorations were clinically evaluated by 2 operators 1 week after placement (baseline) and at 6 months and 1, 2, and 3 years using modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria. At the 3-year follow-up, 62 class I and class II cavities were reevaluated in 23 patients (7 males and 16 females). Statistical analysis was performed using Pearson's. 2 and Fisher's exact tests (p < 0.05). Results: At the 6-month follow-up, all restorations received Alfa scores with respect to each evaluation criterion. At the 1-year follow-up, 2 QuiXfil restorations had to be replaced and Grandio restorations started to deteriorate in terms of marginal adaptation. At the end of 2 years, 9 Grandio restorations showed significant deterioration of the surface properties, demonstrating Bravo scores. At the end of 3 years, no significant differences were observed regarding color match, marginal adaptation, secondary caries, marginal discoloration, and anatomic form loss between the evaluated materials in 25 class I and 37 class II restorations. At the 3-year follow-up, Grandio restorations had 21% Bravo scores and showed significant deterioration of the surface properties, which were still clinically acceptable according to USPHS criteria. Three QuiXfil and 1 Grandio restorations were replaced because of secondary caries and loss of retention. Conclusions: Both the nanohybrid (Grandio) and the microhybrid (QuiXfil) composites were clinically functional after 3 years. (C) 2014 S. Karger AG, Baselen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1159/000364874en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectResin compositeen_US
dc.subjectUnited States Public Health Service criteriaen_US
dc.subjectClinical follow-upen_US
dc.subjectPosterior restorationen_US
dc.titleClinical Evaluation of Resin-Based Composites in Posterior Restorations: A 3-Year Studyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalMEDICAL PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICEen_US
dc.identifier.volume23en_US
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.startpage453en_US
dc.identifier.endpage459en_US
dc.identifier.wos000341963000010


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record