Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAcar, Ozlem
dc.contributor.authorTuncer, Duygu
dc.contributor.authorYuzugullu, Bulem
dc.contributor.authorCelik, Cigdem
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-23T13:04:33Z
dc.date.available2019-12-23T13:04:33Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.issn2005-7806
dc.identifier.urihttps://synapse.koreamed.org/Synapse/Data/PDFData/0170JAP/jap-6-88.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/4525
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE. The purpose of this study is to evaluate if pre-treatment with desensitizers have a negative effect on microtensile bond strength before cementing a restoration using recently introduced self-adhesive resin cement to dentin. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Thirty-five human molars' occlusal surfaces were ground to expose dentin; and were randomly grouped as (n=5); 1) Gluma-(Glutaraldehyde/HEMA) 2) Aqua-Prep F-(Fluoride), 3) Bisblock-(Oxalate), 4) Cervitec Plus-(Clorhexidine), 5) Smart protect-(Triclosan), 6) Nd:YAG laser, 7) No treatment (control). After applying the selected agent, RelyX U200 self-adhesive resin cement was used to bond composite resin blocks to dentin. All groups were subjected to thermocycling for 1000 cycles between 5-55 degrees C. Each bonded specimen was sectioned to microbars (6 mm X 1 mm X 1 mm) (n=20). Specimens were submitted to microtensile bond strength test at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Levene's test, Kruskal Wallis One-way Analysis of Variance, and Conover's nonparametric statistical analysis were used (P<.05). RESULTS. Gluma, Smart Protect and Nd:YAG laser treatments showed comparable microtensile bond strengths compared with the control group (P>.05). The microtensile bond strengths of Aqua-Prep F, and Cervitec Plus were similar to each other but significantly lower than the control group (P<.05). Bisblock showed the lowest microtensile bond strength among all groups (P<.001). Most groups showed adhesive failure. CONCLUSION. Within the limitation of this study, it is not recommended to use Aqua-prep F, Cervitec Plus and Bisblock on dentin when used with a self-adhesive resin cement due to the decrease they cause in bond strength. Beside, pre-treatment of dentin with Gluma, Smart protect, and Nd:YAG laser do not have a negative effect.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.4047/jap.2014.6.2.88en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectDesensitizer agentsen_US
dc.subjectDentin pretreatmenten_US
dc.subjectNd:YAG laseren_US
dc.subjectSelf-adhesive resin cementen_US
dc.subjectMicrotensile bond strengthen_US
dc.subjectAdhesive cementationen_US
dc.titleThe effect of dentin desensitizers, and Nd:YAG laser pre-treatment on microtensile bond strength of self-adhesive resin cement to dentinen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF ADVANCED PROSTHODONTICSen_US
dc.identifier.volume6en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage88en_US
dc.identifier.endpage95en_US
dc.identifier.wos000335545800003


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record