Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorKalelioglu, Filiz
dc.contributor.authorGulbahar, Yasemin
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-26T07:22:52Z
dc.date.available2019-12-26T07:22:52Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.issn1176-3647
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.17.1.248?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/4549
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this research study was to explore the effect of instructional techniques on critical thinking and critical thinking dispositions in online discussion, based on triangulation design. Six Thinking Hats, Brainstorming, Role Playing, Socratic Seminar, and Anyone Here an Expert, were selected as an instructional techniques for online discussion. In the quantitative part, according to the results of ANOVA, except Socratic Seminar, there is no difference between groups in terms of scores of pre-tests and post-tests of critical thinking dispositions. In the qualitative part, according to the results of the analysis of critical thinking in online discussion, the Mixed Techniques group performed as having the best ability of critical thinking, the Anyone Here an Expert group was second and the Brainstorming group was third in terms of performing critical thinking ability in online discussion.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectInstructional techniquesen_US
dc.subjectCritical thinkingen_US
dc.subjectCritical thinking dispositionsen_US
dc.subjectOnline discussionen_US
dc.titleThe Effect of Instructional Techniques on Critical Thinking and Critical Thinking Dispositions in Online Discussionen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalEDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY & SOCIETYen_US
dc.identifier.volume17en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage248en_US
dc.identifier.endpage258en_US
dc.identifier.wos000332752000021


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster