Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorSonmez, Gul
dc.contributor.authorKamburoglu, Kivanc
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Funda
dc.contributor.authorKoc, Cemre
dc.contributor.authorBaris, Emre
dc.contributor.authorTuzuner, Aysegul
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-21T12:32:42Z
dc.date.available2020-12-21T12:32:42Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn0250-832Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6747443/
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/5112
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To evaluate and compare the diagnostic potential of high resolution ultrasound with periapical radiographs (PR) and CBCT in assessing granulomas and radicular cysts. Methods: This study included a total of 33 teeth from 33 patients with periapical lesions. Subjects were distributed among three groups. A consisted of teeth that were extracted. B consisted of teeth treated with root-canal treatment followed by apical surgery. C consisted of teeth treated with root-canal treatment only. Pre-treatment PR, ultrasound and CBCT images were obtained for Groups A, B and C and 6 month post-treatment PR and ultrasound images were obtained for Groups B and C. In addition, histopathological analysis was performed on lesions in Groups A and B. Lesions were classified as either cystic lesions or granulomas. Width, height, depth, surface area and volume of lesions were measured using the built-in softwares of the appropriate imaging modalities. Measurements were compared by Wilcoxon and paired sample t tests. Ultrasound and histopathological findings were compared with lc and Mc Nemar. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: kappa coefficient (0.667; p = 0.002) suggested good agreement between ultrasound and histopathology. No statistically significant differences were found among periapical radiography, CBCT and ultrasound in the pre-treatment measurements of lesion width ( p = 0.308) or between CBCT and periapical radiography in the pre-treatment measurements of lesion height ( p = 0.863). In all cases, mean measurement values for all variables were lower for ultrasound than for CBCT. Conclusion: Ultrasound provided useful information for the diagnosis and assessment of granulomas and radicular cysts.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1259/dmfr.20190082en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectUltrasonographyen_US
dc.subjectCBCTen_US
dc.subjectRadiologyen_US
dc.subjectPeriapical pathosisen_US
dc.titleVersatility of high resolution ultrasonography in the assessment of granulomas and radicular cysts: a comparative in vivo studyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalDENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGYen_US
dc.identifier.volume48en_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.wos000482211000009en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85071689289en_US
dc.contributor.pubmedID31188679en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergien_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster