Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorTombul, Hatice
dc.contributor.authorOzbayoglu, A. Murat
dc.contributor.authorOzbayoglu, M. Evren
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-04T09:13:44Z
dc.date.available2021-03-04T09:13:44Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn0920-4105en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/5490
dc.description.abstractIn multi-phase flow, the gas phase, the liquid phase and the particles (cuttings) within the liquid have different flow behaviors. Particle velocity and particle direction are two of the important aspects for determining the drilling particle behavior in multi-phase flows. There exists a lack of information about particle behavior inside a drilling annular wellbore. This paper presents an approach for particle velocity and direction estimation based on data obtained through Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) techniques fed into computational intelligence models, in particular Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) and Support Vector Machines (SVM). In this work, feed forward neural networks, support vector machines, support vector regression, linear regression and nonlinear regression models are used for estimating both particle velocity and particle direction. The proposed system was trained and tested using the experimental data obtained from an eccentric pipe configuration. Experiments have been conducted at the Cuttings Transport and Multi-phase Flow Laboratory of the Department of Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering at Middle East Technical University. A high speed digital camera was used for recording the flow at the laboratory. Collected experimental data set consisted of 1080 and 1235 data points for 15 degrees inclined wellbores, 1087 and 1552 data points for 30 degrees inclined wellbores and 885 and 1119 data points for horizontal (0 degrees), wellbores respectively to use in estimation and classification problems. Results obtained from computational intelligence models are compared with each other through some performance metrics. The results showed that the SVM model was the best estimator for direction estimation, meanwhile the SVR model was the best estimator for velocity estimation. The direction and speed of the particles were estimated with a reasonable accuracy; hence the proposed model can be used in eccentric pipes in the field.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.petrol.2018.09.071en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCuttings transporten_US
dc.subjectHorizontal and inclined wellboreen_US
dc.subjectEccentric annular pipeen_US
dc.subjectMulti-phase flowen_US
dc.subjectParticle image velocimetryen_US
dc.subjectComputational intelligence modelsen_US
dc.subjectSVMen_US
dc.subjectNeural networksen_US
dc.titleComputational intelligence models for PIV based particle (cuttings) direction and velocity estimation in multi-phase flowsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERINGen_US
dc.identifier.volume172en_US
dc.identifier.startpage547en_US
dc.identifier.endpage558en_US
dc.identifier.wos000447888300052en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85054298275en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergien_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster